Tesla faces a pivotal moment as its board warns that CEO Elon Musk could walk away if shareholders reject his $1 trillion compensation package. The upcoming vote will test investors’ trust in one of the most influential figures in modern technology.
In a striking letter to investors this week, Robyn Denholm, Chair of Tesla’s Board of Directors, delivered a stark warning:
If Elon Musk’s record-breaking $1 trillion pay package isn’t approved, Tesla could lose the visionary leader who has defined its success.
“Without Elon, Tesla could lose significant value, as our company may no longer be valued for what we aim to become,” Denholm wrote ahead of the annual shareholders’ meeting on November 6.
The shareholder vote — which closes at 11:59 p.m. ET on November 5 — is shaping up to be more than a compensation decision. It’s a showdown over vision, power, and confidence in one of the most polarizing CEOs in corporate history.
Tesla’s proposal lays out a compensation structure unlike any other in corporate America:
12 performance-based tranches of stock awards that Musk will only receive if Tesla meets a series of aggressive milestones.
First milestone: Tesla must reach a $2 trillion market capitalization (currently about $1.5 trillion).
Next nine tranches: each adds $500 billion in market value.
Final two tranches: $1 trillion increments, bringing the total target to an $8.5 trillion valuation — nearly six times today’s figure.
The package also ties Musk’s rewards to key production and technology targets, including:
20 million vehicles delivered globally;
10 million active Full Self Driving (FSD) subscriptions;
1 million humanoid Optimus robots shipped;
1 million robotaxis in commercial operation;
EBITDA targets starting at $50 billion and scaling up to $400 billion.
If all milestones are achieved, Musk would receive 423 million additional Tesla shares, boosting his ownership from 13% to roughly 25% — giving him unprecedented voting power within the company.
The package has ignited fierce debate across the financial community.
Leading proxy advisory firms, including Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis, have urged investors to vote against the plan, citing its “astronomical” scale and the risk of shareholder dilution and board dependency.
Meanwhile, a coalition of unions and corporate watchdogs launched the campaign “Take Back Tesla,” warning that Musk’s increasing political radicalism and use of social media to promote conspiracy theories have tarnished Tesla’s image.
Musk, never one to hold back, fired back on Tesla’s latest earnings call — calling proxy firms “corporate terrorists” and claiming they failed to understand Tesla’s long-term vision for artificial intelligence and robotics.
Chair Robyn Denholm defended the proposal, saying Musk is not just Tesla’s CEO but its driving creative force as the company shifts from an electric vehicle manufacturer to a broader AI and robotics powerhouse.
Speaking to CNBC, Denholm said:
“Tesla’s future opportunities, given our AI focus and the unique capabilities that Elon brings, are enormous. His leadership is critical to capturing that potential.”
Denholm emphasized that the package isn’t simply about compensation — it’s a strategic retention mechanism, ensuring Musk’s continued involvement in projects like the Optimus robot and Full Self Driving systems.
Market analysts describe Tesla’s situation as a balancing act between innovation and governance.
While the company reported a 12% revenue increase in Q3, earnings missed Wall Street expectations, underscoring growing competitive pressure from BYD, Rivian, and China’s rapidly advancing EV market.
According to Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities:
“Elon Musk is the reason Tesla became the global symbol it is today. But the question is — how much are shareholders willing to pay to keep him?”
Some analysts argue that if the package is rejected, Musk may shift focus toward his other ventures, including SpaceX and xAI, potentially leaving Tesla without its visionary leadership — a scenario that could dampen innovation and investor confidence.
The vote carries far-reaching implications for Tesla’s governance, valuation, and market trajectory:
Share Dilution: Issuing hundreds of millions of new shares could reduce the value of existing holdings.
Concentration of Power: Musk’s expanded voting control could weaken board independence and shareholder oversight.
Market Reaction: A Musk departure could trigger a sharp sell-off as investors fear a leadership vacuum.
Reputation and Confidence: The vote outcome will signal how strongly shareholders trust Tesla’s long-term direction under Musk’s command.
During last week’s analyst call, Musk made a striking remark about his need for control in Tesla’s AI and robotics future:
“If we’re going to build a robot army, I need to have strong influence over that robot army. I don’t feel comfortable doing it otherwise.”
The comment underscored Musk’s belief that his leadership must remain tightly intertwined with Tesla’s AI evolution — but also fueled critics who see the package as an attempt to consolidate personal power under the guise of innovation.
The final decision will be revealed at Tesla’s Annual Shareholders’ Meeting on November 6.
Regardless of the outcome, analysts agree that this vote represents one of the most consequential moments in Tesla’s 21-year history.
If approved, the deal would cement Musk’s status as one of the most powerful and highly compensated CEOs in modern corporate history, while propelling Tesla deeper into the realms of AI, automation, and robotics.
If rejected, it could plunge the company into a leadership crisis, forcing the board — and investors — to confront an uncomfortable question:
“What is Tesla without Elon Musk?”
The battle over Elon Musk’s $1 trillion pay package is far more than a corporate pay dispute — it’s a referendum on faith in vision versus governance discipline.
For investors, the choice is stark: reward the visionary who built Tesla’s global dominance, or curb a concentration of power that could define — or destabilize — the company’s future.
No matter the outcome, this moment will be remembered as the one that tested not only Tesla’s leadership but also the limits of how much the world is willing to pay for genius.
1. Why is Tesla proposing such a massive pay package for Elon Musk?
→ Tesla’s board argues that it’s designed to retain Musk’s leadership as the company transforms into an AI-driven technology enterprise, ensuring his commitment to long-term goals.
2. What are the conditions tied to the package?
→ Musk will only receive the award if Tesla hits demanding market-cap, profitability, and production milestones — ranging from $2 trillion to $8.5 trillion in valuation, plus ambitious targets for vehicle and robot output.
3. Who opposes the plan and why?
→ Proxy advisors like ISS and Glass Lewis, along with several shareholder groups, oppose the package, citing governance concerns, dilution risks, and excessive concentration of control.
4. What happens if shareholders vote “No”?
→ Tesla’s board has warned that Musk could step down or reduce his involvement, potentially shaking investor confidence and affecting the company’s strategic continuity.
.png){kind=logo}
Tiếng Việt
English
