Global investors grow cautious as AI stocks slide and regulators warn of overheated valuations, reviving fears of a tech bubble reminiscent of 2000.
The dazzling rise of artificial intelligence stocks that defined much of 2024 is beginning to show cracks. Over the past week, a wave of selling across U.S. technology shares has reignited fears that the AI revolution — once hailed as the unstoppable growth story of this decade — might be entering bubble territory.
From Wall Street to Tokyo, investors and regulators are growing uneasy. Both the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Bank of England (BoE) issued rare warnings that valuations in the tech and AI sectors have reached unsustainable levels, echoing the sentiment that once preceded the dot-com crash in the early 2000s.
The IMF cautioned that the scale and speed of capital inflows into AI “far exceed fundamental profit potential in the near term.” Meanwhile, the BoE flagged “heightened systemic risks” tied to overconcentration in a small cluster of mega-cap technology companies — primarily those dominating AI infrastructure, chips, and cloud services.
After months of record-breaking gains, U.S. tech shares have stumbled. Major players such as Nvidia, Microsoft, and Palantir have seen their stock prices slide as traders reassess whether the explosive growth in AI investments can continue at its current pace.
The week’s downturn was amplified when Michael Burry’s Scion Asset Management — the hedge fund led by the famed “Big Short” investor — disclosed new short positions against both Palantir Technologies and Nvidia. The move sparked heated debate across financial circles, with some interpreting it as a sign of growing skepticism about the sector’s valuation excesses.
In Asia, SoftBank Group, a bellwether for AI and technology sentiment, lost nearly $50 billion in market value in one week, extending a decline that began mid-year. The Japanese conglomerate — which holds extensive stakes across AI infrastructure and semiconductor startups — fell another 10% on Wednesday before continuing its downward slide Friday.
Such losses underscore a shift in investor psychology: AI is no longer viewed as an untouchable growth story, but rather as a market segment exposed to cyclical forces and speculative exuberance.
While some investors fear that the AI rally is faltering, others see the current pullback as a healthy and necessary correction.
Kiran Ganesh, Multi-Asset Strategist at UBS, told CNBC that the broader narrative remains encouraging:
“We’ve had a remarkably smooth rally given the scale of investment and uncertainty around future cash flows. Some volatility was to be expected — the bigger picture still looks positive.”
Ganesh noted that corporate earnings throughout the recent reporting season have been broadly reassuring, suggesting that while AI valuations may cool, the underlying adoption trend remains intact.
Similarly, Glen Smith, Chief Investment Officer at GDS Wealth Management, said that current price declines could present long-term entry points:
“Some big tech stocks are effectively on sale. For investors who missed the AI boom earlier this year, this could be an opportunity — provided they’re selective and patient.”
Not all regions share the same anxiety.
In Europe, Anders Danielsson, CEO of Swedish construction giant Skanska, which builds data centers and AI infrastructure, dismissed concerns of a slowdown:
“In the U.S., our data center pipeline remains very strong. We’re seeing no slowdown in demand — in fact, international customers are expanding projects across central Europe, the Nordics, and the U.K.”
This resilience highlights a paradox: while equity valuations face pressure, real-world investment in AI infrastructure continues at full speed. Demand for computing power, data storage, and green-energy-driven server facilities remains relentless — suggesting that even if financial markets cool, the technological transition will persist.
Both the IMF and the BoE’s recent comments recall the tone of the late 1990s, when global regulators cautioned that “irrational exuberance” was inflating tech stock prices.
The BoE, in its October Financial Stability Report, warned that “the pace of AI-related capital expenditure and the level of leverage in financing structures pose potential risks to market stability.” The IMF echoed this sentiment, comparing the current AI surge to the early Internet era — where innovation was real, but profits lagged far behind investor enthusiasm.
The shared message is clear: AI is transformative, but valuations must align with tangible results. Without proven revenue streams, many startups and listed firms risk being caught in a valuation mismatch once monetary conditions tighten or investor sentiment shifts.
A key concern among regulators and investors alike is market concentration.
Just seven U.S. technology firms now account for nearly 30% of the S&P 500’s total market capitalization, the highest concentration level in modern history. That imbalance means any meaningful correction in a few AI-linked names — particularly chipmakers or cloud leaders — could drag the entire index lower.
Additionally, the lack of diversification across investor portfolios compounds the risk. Large institutional funds, pension systems, and even retail investors have heavily overweighted positions in AI giants, often financed through leveraged derivatives or exchange-traded funds.
“Once confidence breaks, liquidity evaporates fast,” a London-based equity strategist warned. “The issue isn’t whether AI is the future — it’s whether markets have priced that future too far ahead of reality.”
Some asset managers are already looking beyond the U.S. for AI exposure.
Luca Paolini, Chief Strategist at Pictet Asset Management, emphasized a shift in focus:
“We’re neutral on U.S. tech because valuations are stretched. Instead, we see more balanced opportunities across emerging markets — particularly in India, Brazil, and broader Asia, where AI-driven investment and monetary easing can still support growth.”
Such diversification could prove vital if U.S. valuations continue to unwind. Emerging markets benefit from lower entry costs, government-backed digital initiatives, and growing domestic consumption — all of which position them as secondary beneficiaries of the global AI revolution.
Despite near-term volatility, the consensus among long-term strategists remains cautiously optimistic. The world’s largest corporations — from healthcare to construction to financial services — are still integrating AI to enhance productivity and profitability. That structural trend will likely endure even if equity prices temporarily deflate.
However, experts warn against blind optimism. The current phase demands selective investing, disciplined risk management, and a willingness to look beyond headline AI names. For every Nvidia or Microsoft that delivers genuine value creation, dozens of smaller firms may never achieve profitability.
In short: AI is here to stay, but valuation discipline is once again the market’s most valuable commodity.
Artificial intelligence represents the defining technological wave of this generation — reshaping industries, labor markets, and global trade. Yet, history reminds us that every breakthrough comes with cycles of excess and correction.
As AI excitement meets valuation fatigue, investors must navigate between long-term innovation potential and short-term speculative risk. Whether this week’s pullback marks the beginning of a deeper unwind or merely a healthy reset will depend on one factor: how quickly AI companies can turn revolutionary ideas into sustainable profits.
1. Why are global regulators warning about an AI bubble?
Because valuations across major tech stocks have surged beyond historical norms, and earnings growth hasn’t yet caught up. Regulators fear that an abrupt correction could destabilize broader markets.
2. Is the AI rally over?
Not necessarily. Many strategists believe this is a natural cooling phase. Core demand for AI infrastructure and enterprise adoption remains strong, even as stock prices normalize.
3. How should investors adjust their portfolios?
Diversify across sectors and geographies. Reduce exposure to overvalued U.S. tech names and consider emerging markets or value-driven sectors like infrastructure and manufacturing.
4. Could this become another dot-com-style crash?
It’s possible, but unlikely on the same scale. Unlike 2000, AI technology already has tangible applications and revenue potential. The challenge lies in ensuring valuations stay grounded in fundamentals.
.png){kind=logo}
Tiếng Việt
English
